SHADOWS ON THE WALL | REVIEWS | NEWS | FESTIVAL | AWARDS | Q&A | ABOUT | TALKBACK | |||
Brokeback Mountain | |||
R E V I E W B Y R I C H C L I N E |
dir Ang Lee scr Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana with Heath Ledger, Jake Gyllenhaal, Michelle Williams, Anne Hathaway, Randy Quaid, Linda Cardellini, Anna Faris, David Harbour, Kate Mara, Scott Michael Campbell, Roberta Maxwell, Peter McRobbie release US 9.Dec.05, UK 30.Dec.05 05/US 2h15 Howdy pardner: Ledger and Gyllenhaal
VENICE FILM FEST
| ||
This achingly beautiful drama deserves to be a big hit and garner many awards, but the ideas it explores will prevent that from happening. Just as they keep the film from properly opening up its themes.
Ennis and Jack (Ledger and Gyllenhaal) meet in the summer of 1963 when they both herd sheep on Brokeback Mountain in Wyoming. These two are a dying breed, and alone in the mountains they discover a camaraderie that extends into the sleeping bag. But since this is unacceptable back down the mountain, they go their separate ways. Ennis marries his childhood sweetheart (Williams) and has two kids; Jack moves to Texas and marries a rich girl (Hathaway). Four years later, they meet again. "What are we gonna do now?" As the story continues over nearly two decades, it deepens and resonates in unexpected ways that are raw and revealing. This is an extremely important story, and not just because of the sexuality issue; anyone who has reluctantly fallen in love or been forced into an expected life can identify with this film. As usual, Lee directs with subtle attention to detail, capturing both the awesome grandeur of the scenery and the telling flickers of a character's eye, from small outdoor adventures to heaving internal yearnings. The actors pour their souls into these roles. All four central cast members have moments of transparency that shake us to the core. Ledger is the standout, with an open-hearted performance that catches us in the back of the throat. His interaction with every other character is what drives the plot forward with relentless force. When he's overcome with longing, it's actually hard to watch. Where the film stumbles is in the editing, assuming more scenes between Ennis and Jack were filmed. But what's left is only the bare outline of their relationship. We get the introduction, and one moment of true tenderness. Otherwise, they're never together in any meaningful way. We know they can't live without each other only because they talk about it. But there's a nagging sense that, even though this is a thoroughly adult film about giving into a fear of how society will react, that's exactly what the filmmakers have done. Which, in a film this powerfully emotional and resonant, is both a pity and a shame.
| |||
julie, las vegas: "unbelievably well-done; I can't seem to get this movie out of my mind. I saw it two days ago. I want to go see it again, hopefully to understand the vomit scene at the side of the building; was he physically ill by his own actions, or so distraught by his love that he had to let it out somehow?" (9.Jan.06)
Michelle, London: "Stunning film! The acting was sublime - it made up for a lot of Heath Ledger's dialogue being rather unintelligible! A love story which really tugs at your heartstrings as you feel for each of the main characters - Michelle Williams was excellent I felt. The scenery is absolutely beautiful and makes for a perfect backdrop. I think this is a film which would touch you no matter how many times you saw it and is definately worth going to see again." (17.Jan.06) Scott, Ohio: "I could not get this film off my mind! I was so moved by these characters I couldn't begin to explain it. Michelle's acting was great! Then there was Jack's mother. I thought she was awesome! Of course Heath and Jake were great! I'm going again!" (5.Feb.06) Donna Carter, Wisconsin: "I was truly surprised not to be impressed. I was expecting a poignant, sad love story, but instead I felt like all I saw between the characters (especially from Ennis toward Jack) was angst, awkward frustration, anger, addictive behaviour and disappointment. Obviously there was the conflict with societal inhibitions of the time which deeply affected their ability to even have a relationship, and included all those feelings I saw. But there was so much that expounded on external influences, and so little on the relationship itself, that it was sometimes frustrating to watch. Surely there was more to their relationship than that? Character development was deeply deficient. And where was the passion? I sensed near zero chemistry between the main characters most of the time. The sensitive emotion in the last couple of scenes was more what I expected of the whole thing. I was sadly surprised to be disappointed. I expected a really well-written, well-made movie. Oh well. Great cinematography." (19.Feb.06) | |||
© 2005 by Rich Cline, Shadows on the Wall
HOME | REVIEWS | NEWS | FESTIVAL | AWARDS | Q&A | ABOUT | TALKBACK |