On this page: COCK & BULL STORY | I LOVE YOU BABY | MANGO SOUFFLE | WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT < < M O R E | M O R E > > Back to the SHADOWS FILM FEST page • FESTIVAL SHORTS • last update 15.Apr.03 | ||
There are some interesting themes working here, especially the whole issue of denial in such a machismo culture. And the film looks quite good, shot with an edgy street vibe and an energetic level of performances that leave us wondering what the characters might do next. But the plot itself is corny, relying on cliches to propel it, down to trite subplots and some truly appalling dialog. Much of this reflects the theatrical roots--it's just too over-dramatised to work on screen. And in trying to reflect the suppressed sexuality, the Hayes makes it far too subtle and ambiguous. We never feel even a tiny sense of the internal struggle these guys must be going through, even though they're well-played. And Hayes goes overboard to reinforce the manliness of his characters, with constant effing-and-blinding language and excessive physical violence, both in and out of the ring. What he misses is the tenderness and emotion--even masculine emotion--that would have made the story come to life. [themes, strong language, violence] 24.Mar.03 llgff | ||
It's never a good idea to use such a ludicrous plot device to drive an otherwise serious storyline. And the disco ball scene loses us completely, especially when a running gag involving Boy George tries to cash in on the idea. This is a shame, because the film has a charming tone that could have been engaging and enjoyable--it should be a sweet opposites-attract rom-com. But the directors never square the comedy with the drama, and they lose focus by concentrating far too much on Marisol's gaggle of gossipy friends, letting the central Marcos-Daniel plot drift badly in the process. Meanwhile, Daniel's attempt to win back Marcos is extremely unconvincing; we can't believe it for a second, and as a result we lose interest in the characters altogether. Even though the film is still watchable, the plot is just too clunky to work on any level. And for a story with sexuality as its central theme, the filmmakers undercut it with an overriding anti-gay sensibility that throws everything even further off balance. [themes, language, sex] 12.Apr.03 llgff | ||
MANGO SOUFFLÉ | ||
The main problem is the film's 1970s production style, complete with glaringly coloured film stock, perplexing music, strained performances and stiff direction. It's just not easy to see as the contemporary story it so obviously is. Much of the dialog is the kind of over-written stuff that works well on stage, but not on screen. And the same can be said about the direction, which is stagey and corny. That said, there are profound issues about sexuality and society that are well worth examining, and in its own clumsy way the film does deal with them! Relational secrets are pretty much the same the world over, and Dattani really captures the idea that just because these people are in rural India doesn't mean the issues are any more black and white. Indeed, he's clearly trying to recreate a New York gay-scene comedy. But for Western audiences, getting beyond this film's goofy style to the solid centre is a real chore. [themes, language] 22.Mar.03 | ||
John Cameron Mitchell and Stephen Trask are at the centre here, talking about their creation lovingly and tellingly--their sharp wit and astonishing creativity come through loud and clear (as if we had any doubts after seeing the film!) as we follow them through the early days experimenting with the character in New York clubs to the Off-Broadway sensation to the film production process and the Sundance awards ceremony (the film won both the audience award and best director). There's nothing superfluous here; and the film doesn't leave us wanting more, besides watching the feature film again! This is an extremely well-assembled narrative documentary, tracing the story coherently and collating clips from all over the place--and it's great stuff too! It gives us much more than we'd ever dream to ask, and at the same time draws out Hedwig's themes and ideas with force and emotion. If it hedges its bets at all, it's in the avoidance of conflict. There is clearly some tension between Trask and Mitchell, and understandably so since both are equally involved in creating the character but Mitchell gets all the accolades. Also, the interviews with Mitchell's parents are telling and fascinating, but avoid their obvious discomfort with their son's sexuality. This was commissioned by NewLine for inclusion on the Hedwig DVD, then expanded into a feature of its own, although it has only been seen at festivals. It's a must for all Hedwig fans. It's the ultimate companion piece to an extraordinary film. [themes, language] 12.Apr.03 llgff SEE ALSO HEDWIG AND THE ANGRY INCH |
< < M O R E | M O R E > >
© 2003 by Rich Cline, Shadows
on the Wall