On this page: FOOD OF LOVE | HOOKED | 9 DEAD GAY GUYS | OPEN | SUDDENLY < < M O R E | M O R E > > Back to the SHADOWS FILM FEST page • FESTIVAL SHORTS • last update 15.Apr.03 | ||
This is an extremely melodramatic tale of love, centring on the difficult relationship between a mother and her son, but encompassing questions of sexuality, discovering a vocation, trusting your loved ones, and so on. These are definitely vital things worth examining in a film, but Catalonian writer-director Pons (working in English for the first time) makes it all just a bit too serious and self-important, never letting the story develop a natural rhythm. This is especially frustrating since there is some very good acting from the virtually all-British cast, most notably from Stevenson (as usual), who plays the ditsy blonde American housewife to perfection, then gets under the surface brilliantly. Bishop is a bit more problematic; whether it's his performance or the way it's written/directed, Paul is so mopey and harsh that we never like him much. In the end this leaves a rather huge gap exactly where we need to find something to identify with. [adult themes and situations, language] 17.Mar.03 llgff | ||
Frustratingly, Ahlberg can't seem to decide who his audience should be. The film has one of those all-encompassing outlines that tries to tell us everything about gay internet chat (not very interesting) then suddenly becomes cautionary and very specific (gripping and provocative) ... then back to general stuff. As an audience member, we find ourselves wishing he had been more brutal in the editing process, leaving out the self-indulgent chatter and boring explanations and focusing more finely on the theme at hand. Because this is a very interesting and important issue that is rarely addressed on screen with such open candour. Technically, the film is sharply well-made, with a clever use of webcam perspectives and cutaways to roadway imagery (it's the internet superhighway, get it?). And it becomes quite powerful when it finally touches on the real issues of self-image and the fact that the way society treats gay men contributes to their need to find affirmation among their peers, even if it means treating each other as objects, not people. To be honest, this should have been the starting point. And maybe Ahlberg has only begun to speak about this. [themes, language, nudity] 19.Mar.03 llgff | ||
Using death as a comic tool is a risky thing to do, and even the zaniest tone can't overcome this central problem as people drop like flies either accidentally or casually murdered, usually for the wrong reasons. It's extremely absurd, but not quite witty enough to work. And it doesn't help that the film as a whole is very derivative, relying on overused post-modern narration, freeze-frames, invented catch phrases and sassy title graphics. Even though this is mildly funny (and fairly raucous with a rowdy cinema audience), the problem is that the filmmakers think it's much more hip than it is. You know you're in trouble when they expect a big laugh from a trio of old ladies talking graphically about sex. Sigh! Anyway, writer-director Lab Ky Mo shows some visual promise, and even the plot itself is inventive and freewheeling. Meanwhile, Mackey and Mulhern are very good actors, surrounded by ridiculous stereotype characters that at least make us laugh from time to time. [18 adult themes, language, vulgarity, innuendo] 15.Mar.03 llgff | ||
This is frank, honest and surprisingly informative, mostly because it sticks with the personal experiences of these three couples, never trying to make general statements one way or another. The film never gets salacious or vulgar (it's all interview footage with only a few illustrative stills). All sides of the issue are examined, including safety and health, and it soon becomes clear that jealousy is the big issue. Director Pomerantz genuinely seems to go into this with an open mind, looking for an answer to that central question. And even he seems disappointed that the answer is apparently no, gay couples cannot be monogamous over time. It's quite revealing to see the various men admit this, because each of the six comes from a different place to this realization, even though some hold onto a kernel of hope! Is this due to cultural conditioning, trying to apply straight values to a gay environment? Or is it simply due to the lifestyle itself, the refusal of homosexuals to follow any rules? It's an interesting discussion that has applications for straight relationships as well. And it's certainly a great conversation starter! [strong themes, some language] 19.Mar.03 | ||
SUDDENLY [Tan de Repente] | ||
This isn't a straight-on comedy by a long shot. It's a quirky character study that will make everyone in the audience laugh at different places, mostly at the way the people on screen react to each other. The film's charm rests in the fact that nobody behaves the way you expect them to. Liaisons form and break up, then regroup and settle down in unexpected ways. Lerman's film is perhaps a bit too subtle for general audiences, especially after the edgy promise of the opening sequence when we think we're heading for a Thelma & Louise type road movie. The rest of the film seems rambling and pointless by comparison. But the black and white cinematography is beautiful and revelatory, letting the cast toy with each situation while tantalizingly capturing the scenes from telling angles. In the end nothing much happens. And everything in the world happens as well. All of a sudden, when the characters (and we) least expect it. [15 themes, language, nudity] 11.Apr.03 llgff |
< < M O R E | M O R E > >
© 2003 by Rich Cline, Shadows
on the Wall