Sex and Lucia |
![]() Pillow talk. Lucia and Lorenzo are happy until the past collides with the future... | |||
Lucía y el Sexo
dir-scr Julio Medem | ||||
![]() Yes, the story cycles around, curling back in on itself, but it does so in such a lovely way that we can't help but go along for the ride. There's an emotional resonance here that is stunningly authentic, brilliantly capturing on screen the joys of physical love and attraction. The script, direction and transparent performances from the entire cast all work together beautifully to help us feel what these people are going through. Even if the oblique storytelling and obvious symbolism leave us a bit cold, the plot does make sense on a basic level, tying up all the loose ends and helping us understand all of the characters and their emotional responses to what happens to them. Yes, Medem has once again crafted a complex, ethereal film that's both delicate and earthy, full of memorable imagery, gutsy performances and unforgettable, haunting themes.
| ||||
![]() ![]() "Once you get beyond the nudity and sex, is there really any point to this movie? Also, it should have been shot on film rather than digital. I find the former comments regarding the superfluity of male nudity perplexing. This is a movie about sex ... why shouldn't there be full-frontal male nudity? As a woman, I appreciate it because I am not interested in Vega's breasts. Obviously, some viewers are not really comfortable with this genre. The male nudity is refreshing and necessary!" --Alice Rogier, USA 5.Aug.02 "The ultimate head-trip. A seemingly purposefully puzzling Spanish indie answer to David Lynch's masterpiece Mulholland Drive. The controversy inspired by Lynch's work is sure to crossover to Lucia, which is a lot more heady, if not a whole lot more powerful and intriguing ... and sexual! I couldn't honestly tell you what the film is about, as the story begins one way, middles off another way, and climaxes a whole 'nother way to frustrate your brain some more. But this film is an experience, plain and simple." --Christopher Hall, Miami 18.Aug.02
"Confusing conglomeration of scenes that somehow make wierd sense. Scenery was superb. Male nudity was refreshing. I agree, why not male nudity? My only complaint was the abundunce of tears. See it if you are not puritanistic, and have something to chew on afterwards." --The Critical Penguin, Leipzig, Germany 22.Oct.02 | ||||
|