|
| ||||
Jurassic Park III
|
![]() All-you-can-eat buffet. Who'll be the next dino-snack (Leoni, Morgan, Macy, Nivola, Neill)? | |||
|
dir Joe Johnston scr Peter Buchman, Alexander Payne, Jim Taylor with Sam Neill, William H Macy, Tea Leoni, Alessandro Nivola, Trevor Morgan, Laura Dern, Michael Jeter, John Diehl, Bruce A Young, Taylor Nichols, Mark Harelik, Julio Oscar Mechoso release US & UK 20.Jul.01 Universal 01/US 1h35
See also: THE LOST WORLD: JURASSIC PARK (1997) <> JURASSIC WORLD (2015) R E V I E W B Y R I C H C L I N E | ||||
The dinosaurs are back again, but this time without Steven Spielberg at the helm ... and it shows. It's still an energetic summer blockbuster, but nowhere near as good as it should be. We have two stars from Part 1 and the same plot as Part 2, which basically centres on Dr Grant (Neill) being convinced to fly over a third dinosaur-populated island with a pair if very rich tourists (Macy and Leoni), his assistant (Nivola) and various assorted mercenaries (Jeter, Diehl, Young, et al). Amid Grant's protestations, the plane lands on the island, so he knows something is amiss here. Soon they're all stranded, confessing to secrets and facing bigger and more intelligent creatures than anyone has ever seen. including some that can fly.
You can hardly go wrong with these films, yet Johnston has added nothing particularly notable besides a slightly above-average interest in the relationships between the characters. But there's none of Spielberg's extremely high standards for plot, character and, most of all, effects. Rather, we get superficial story elements populated by people who are never anything more than they seem to be (even their sneaky secrets are obvious and untextured). We also get no taut set pieces to raise the hairs on the back of our neck. Yes, it's nonstop, loud, crashing action, but there's nothing new or original anywhere (Johnston even uses mist twice to try to build suspense ... unsuccessfully both times). Only some of the effects are remarkable; the animatronics are amazing, but the computer-generated stuff is weak. And we never for a second wonder which characters will survive--it's obvious from the beginning, so there's no real sense of menace or terror. That said, at least everyone in the cast is terrific, making the most of each glimmer of intelligence or humour scattered sparingly in the script. It's a watchable, mindless adventure ... but frankly that's not enough.
| ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||