On this page: DO I LOVE YOU? | GASOLINE | LUSTER | THE TRUE STORY OF MY LIFE IN ROUEN [Ma Vie] | SHAKE IT ALL ABOUT < < M O R E | M O R E > > Back to the SHADOWS FILM FEST page • FESTIVAL SHORTS • last update 16.Apr.03 | ||
GASOLINE [Benzina] | ||
Director-cowriter Stambrini gives the film an urgent biker-chick vibe as these increasingly distressed woman struggle to hold onto their love for each other amid the chaos and panic. Orioli makes Lenni slightly simple and very nervous, while Sansa's Stella is a more tough-skinned hothead ... until her beloved dog is threatened. Even so, the film isn't completely successful; most set pieces are over familiar, and while the film plays heavily with Hitchcockian ideas (a pesky dead body), it never generates the black humour that Hitchcock used to so memorably get under our skin. On the other hand, there is bleak irony in the disembodied advice Lenni's mother continues to offer from the beyond, as well as the fact that they end up giving a lift to a chatty priest (Burruano). And the bumbling youths on the girls' trail have no idea what they're really playing with here. Stambrini is definitely a filmmaker to watch. [15 themes, language, violence] 7.Mar.03 llgff | ||
The film is shot in a cheeky, comic, brightly colourful style that echoes Etienne's personality. As a result, we can fully identify with him and even follow him over the brink into obsession and voyeurism as he continually sticks his camera in people's faces, getting increasingly intimate and resorting to hidden camera invasions of privacy. Newcomer Tavares is charming and energetic (and obviously does all his own skating), while the rest of the cast is so natural that it's almost difficult to see this as fiction. Indeed, the imagery is exactly like raw footage from a teen's camera--fragmented and random, capturing both scenery and milestone events, even poking gentle fun at home video pitfalls ("Don't just stand there, move!"). But more importantly, it cleverly captures Etienne's teen angst, his developing sexuality as he gets more aggressive, exhibitionistic and eventually possibly pathological or suicidal. This last bit isn't exactly subtle, and the film suffers as the plot takes over at the end . It starts to feel like a movie, not a diary. But it's still a perceptive and fascinating glimpse into a teenage mind. [15 adult themes and situations, language] 6.Mar.03 llgff | ||
DO I LOVE YOU? | ||
The performances are all so natural that we believe every scene and character fully. It's lively and funny and very sharply written and played. The big problem is that it's impossible to keep all the characters straight. There are at least 15 female characters all involved in various relationships and none of them are simple (besides Marina's terribly understanding parents). And as the film skips around between the plot threads, it loses its focus by trying to include pretty much every conceivable wrinkle. This has the reverse effect, making the film feel superficial and padded out with extra characters and scenarios. If Gornick had stayed more centred on Marina and her own quest, the film might have carried more of a punch. It's still a fairly charming rom-com about the compulsive nature of cheating. But perhaps she should have taken her superb central thesis more to heart: Don't deconstruct love so much that you lose it. [18 adult themes and situations, language] 6.Mar.03 llgff centrepiece | ||
There's a decent story here, but there's a nagging effort by writer-director Lewis to make this much more unusual than it really is. It's just a standard romantic comedy plot really, with several people entangled in love chaos. But Lewis plays it straight, taking it all terribly seriously and trying to make the characters quirky and arty. The title at least gets it right--this isn't a film about love at first sight; it's a story about lust. We never believe anyone has anything besides sex on their minds, so how can we swoon at a physical connection or flinch at the pain of rejection? It's all completely superficial! That said, the cast is excellent, creating authentic and believable characters even when they are continually required to do and say unbelievable things. And the film does have a dark graininess that makes it at least look good, even if the direction isn't particularly sharp. Jackson's journey is obviously the film's main plot strand, but all of the surrounding stories distract from it and weaken it badly. With a bit more focus and perspective, this could have been a much more insightful and engaging drama. [themes, language, nudity, drugs] 9.Mar.03 llgff • See also: FAQS | ||
This is a guilty pleasure sort of film--lively and entertaining, even though we realise it's not very good, actually. (It's been a mammoth hit in Denmark!) The problem is that director-cowriter Joof tries to deal with serious issues of infidelity and betrayal in the skin of a goofy and predictable rom-com. The actors are excellent across the board, but Mikkelsen's Jakob isn't nearly sympathetic enough for the central role--we don't really want him to get back together with Lyby's incredibly nice-guy Jorgen, who seems willing to put up with far too much of Jakob's selfishness. Meanwhile, Munck's Caroline is pretty dreadful herself, abandoning husband and son (Lohmann and Walsoe) to shack up with her "brother-in-law". Still, there are scads of colourful, less important characters around the fringes to keep us laughing, as well as a script and direction that plays on the strengths and tries to hide the formulaic story. And if the plot's resolution is both obvious and improbable, at least it's romantic. In a trite, cliche sort of way. [themes, language] 13.Apr.03 llgff |
< < M O R E | M O R E > >
© 2003 by Rich Cline, Shadows
on the Wall