HOME | REVIEWS | NEWS | FESTIVAL | AWARDS | Q&A | ABOUT | TALKBACK | |||
School for Seduction | |||
![]() | |||
R E V I E W B Y R I C H C L I N E |
dir Sue Heel scr Sue Heel, Martin Herron with Kelly Brook, Emily Woof, Dervla Kirwan, Margi Clarke, Jessica Johnson, Nicola Blackwell, Daymon Britton, Neil Stuke, Tim Healy, Nick Whitfield, Ben Porter, Jake Canuso release UK 3.Dec.04 04/UK 1h45 ![]() Group hijinks: The girls have a laugh at Britton. ![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||
![]() Yes, director-cowriter Heel clearly has something against men! Not a single one escapes criticism--they're all selfish, insensitive pigs, while the vivacious women around them are all trying to make life better. It's surprising how unbalanced the film is in this area. Sure, it has a good point, but even the story's nicest guy makes some thoughtless mistakes (and gets humiliated in the now-requisite "locked out of the house naked just when Mum and Dad arrive home" scene). The cast is quite good, in an undemanding sort of way. Brook just about carries off her character, which is scripted with an obvious fatal flaw that we just wait to arrive. Meanwhile, there's a marvellous sense of camaraderie between the women that almost makes it feel like a seasoned sitcom. And Heel uses the Newcastle setting well (although perhaps tries too hard to make sure all the landmarks are within view). So it's a pity that she simplifies the issues, settling for either silly hijinks or teary emotion when something edgier would have made the film a lot more telling. And funnier! Her central point is very compelling--that seduction isn't about pleasing men, but pleasing yourself. So why is she so quick to abandon it for mere romantic goofiness?
| |||
![]() ![]() ![]() Richy, Newcastle: | |||
HOME | REVIEWS | NEWS | FESTIVAL | AWARDS | Q&A | ABOUT | TALKBACK |