![]() |
|
MAYOR OF THE SUNSET STRIP | MY HOUSE IN UMBRIA | TOUCHING THE VOID < < M O R E | M O R E > > | |
![]() | |
![]() ![]()
Being a small Spanish film without recognisable stars, it's not easy to keep a dozen characters separate, but even though it sometimes drags a bit, director-cowriter Cesc Gay keeps things wonderfully clear. The focus is squarely on the people, not any plot mechanics, and the result is a deeply internalised drama about the unspoken awkwardness in all relationships. It's clear who's sleeping with whom, although most of the "action" is kept off screen; the children are merely a presence in the edge of the frame, and some key characters never appear at all. Yet everything combines to get us inside the minds of this group of friends who are seemingly successful and happy and yet have nagging questions about their lives ... and worries about their futures. The music is a bit bland, and the "How well do we really know each other?" theme isn't exactly revolutionary. But the cast is raw and natural, just like the filmmaking style, playing on small details and hinting that we get into these situations ourselves. As Gay says, "It's a little, sad movie," but it's also full of subdued hope. There may not be such a thing as a perfect relationship, but love may also be lurking right where we hope it is. [adult themes and situations] 9.Oct.03 lff | |
![]() | |
![]() ![]()
Basically this is an opposites-attract love story, but it's filmed in an otherworldly way, with surprises and fantasies that throw us off course. Red herrings and sudden revelations abound, but the central emotional storyline holds firmly as we get to know two people who have virtually nothing in common (they use English to communicate) yet need each other. Small flashes of humour and violence wake us up from the film's quiet, dreamlike sleepiness. And it looks absolutely amazing, from Ratanaruang's inventive direction to Doyle's astonishing photography, and even some gorgeous special effects. This is a carefully balanced film in which even the gruesome violence has an emotional punch; every scene is intricately staged, specifically edited and played with lovely subtlety by the cast. This is a pinnacle for the talented Asano, who's been making a strong showing lately in films from Miike's Ichi the Killer to Kitano's Zatoichi; and Miike even has a clever role as a tenacious yakuza hitman. All of this combines to paint an exquisite picture of people seemingly at the end of their lives, trying to deal with overwhelming guilt and regret and find even a tiny reason to move forward. [15 themes, language, violence] 17.Oct.03 lff | |
![]() | |
![]() ![]()
The film works best when Hickenlooper digs into Rodney's mystique. Why did Robert Plant once say that Rodney had slept with more women than he had? Why has he been such a close friend to artists like Elvis, Hendrix, Lennon, Bowie, Jagger, the Gallaghers and on and on? Sinatra says it's his spirit. Cher thinks it's because he's genuine, without ulterior motives. Rodney feels that it's because he just looks after people. And indeed, his main reward seems to be the joy he gets from helping others. This also seems to be the reason why he has remained so unaffected after such a fast-paced, glitzy life! Hickenlooper compiles a wealth of home movies, archive photos, extensive interviews and backstage video clips. Rodney was always in the background in record album photos and rock movies, and musicians are aware of the debts they owe him. Where Hickenlooper struggles is in trying to get into the mind of the man; there's too much about his lonely life now, and a sequence in which he takes a kind of spiritual pilgrimage to Britain seems invasive and unnecessary. While footage of Rodney's father and stepmother is apparently only included to show that disaffection runs in the family! In the end, it turns sad and melancholic as Hickenlooper pushes the point further, showing how, as the music industry becomes more ruthless, Rodney is being marginalized by the people who owe him their fortune. It's a good point ... but what a harsh way to end an insightful look a man who's whole life is fuelled by love of music. [themes, language] 10.Oct.03 lff ![]() R E A D E R R E V I E W S Al Rodriguez, Orange County: "Man, that was depressing. His mom abandoned him, his father doesn't seem interested in his life, the woman he loves has another boyfriend, and then his 'best friend' goes and documents all of this (and more!) for the world to see. And then what's really tragic, is that it's like Rodney doesn't realize how depressing his life is, but after seeing this film, he's gonna want to drop some acid to numb the pain. I know I did. But since I don't really drop acid, I had chocolate cake." (28.Mar.04) |
![]() |
![]()
With its sunny photography and Olde Worlde sensibility, this feels like a period film; everyone wears colour-matched Merchant-Ivory clothing and drives vintage cars, and yet it's set in the present day. This odd mixture begins to tip the film into artificial silliness long before the plot weaknesses kick in. That said, the performances are good in a muted sort of way. Smith lets her expressive face fill in the gaps in the trite, overly sweet screenplay; Emily is a colourful and funny character who could have been a revelation in a film with even a bit of edge to it. Cooper seems to be almost sleepwalking through the role, which kind of works for his enigmatic character. Spall is the best thing here as Emily's Man Friday, but even he's much more subdued than usual. The other characters barely register at all. The main problem is that this was filmed as a TV movie, with photography that's never expansive enough for a big screen; and there aren't any visual details, which is a big problem in a film set in an apparently picturesque location with supposedly sumptuous food and evidently quirky characters. This and the overly sentimental story leave the film thin and uninvolving. On television it may work beautifully, but it never begins to fill a cinema. [12 themes, innuendo] 9.Oct.03 | |
![]() | |
![]() ![]()
This is an account of tenacity and survival beyond all reason. The fact that these men are still alive is a miracle itself, but the odyssey they go through makes truly amazing cinema! The film is narrated to camera by Simpson, Yates and Hawking (a hiker who walked with them to the base camp and then waited ... and waited); the drama is re-enacted with actors Mackey, Aaron and Ryall, as well as climbers Cuthbertson and Gregory, on location at Siula Grande and in the Alps. The literally cliffhanging adventure is filmed brilliantly like a full-on action movie compete with special effects and up-close photography that puts us right there on the icy mountain with the climbers, as the firsthand commentary puts us into their minds. While Macdonald goes rather too far trying to create Simpson's delirium on screen (we get it already!), he directs the film beautifully, capturing the intricacies of the men's faces and of the Andes themselves. It's no mean feat to make a mountain range into one of the main characters in the story, but Macdonald does it, combined with Simpson's extremely vivid storytelling (the film is adapted from his eponymous book). And the cinematography is magnificently jaw-dropping! It makes you hope there's an Imax version in the works. Not to mention a making-of doc about this film. [15 themes, language, grisliness] 9.Oct.03 lff ![]() R E A D E R R E V I E W S David Haviland, London: ![]() |
See also the SHADOWS FILM FESTIVAL
.© 2003 by Rich Cline, Shadows on the Wall
HOME | AWARDS | NEWS | Q&A | ABOUT | TALKBACK